Power, Tradition, and Trouble: A Management Consultant's Deep Dive into Nebraska Athletics in the Big Ten Era

Since joining the Big Ten Conference in 2011, the University of Nebraska has symbolized both the promise and peril of realignment in modern college athletics. With its blue-blood football pedigree, nationwide fan base, and elite facilities, Nebraska was expected to immediately thrive in the Big Ten's lucrative, legacy-driven ecosystem. Fourteen years later, however, the Cornhuskers are more often viewed as a cautionary tale. This program generates power and passion off the field but too little performance on it. From a management consultant's perspective, Nebraska Athletics presents a compelling case study: strong balance sheet, elite infrastructure, and fractured strategic execution.

The numbers tell part of the story. For the 2022–23 fiscal year, Nebraska Athletics reported approximately $197 million in total revenue, placing it in the upper tier of Big Ten programs. This revenue exceeds that of schools such as the University of Iowa, the University of Indiana, and Purdue University. It is comparable to that of Wisconsin and Penn State. The department continues to benefit from one of the most dedicated donor and ticket-buying bases in the country. Nebraska's historic sellout streak at Memorial Stadium, intact since 1962, is more than just a tradition; it's a recurring revenue engine. Generous alum support has enabled the school to fund facility expansions and renovate Memorial Stadium, with a $165 million project scheduled for completion by 2026.

Yet when one maps this robust financial performance against athletic success—particularly in football and men's basketball—the dissonance becomes stark. Nebraska has churned through six head football coaches in the past 20 years, a turnover rate that ranks among the worst in the Big Ten. Since entering the conference, the Huskers have not claimed a single division title, let alone a Big Ten championship. They have not reached a major bowl game since the 2006 Cotton Bowl and have not posted a double-digit win season since 2012. For a program once defined by sustained excellence, this era has been described by rebuilding cycles, each shorter and less effective than the last.

Men's basketball has also languished. Nebraska is the only Power Five program to have never won an NCAA Tournament game. Despite brief flashes under coaches like Tim Miles and the current tenure of Fred Hoiberg, the program has never established itself as even a mid-tier Big Ten threat. Meanwhile, rivals such as Purdue, Illinois, and Michigan State have built stable, high-performing programs with similar or fewer resources.

For management consultants, high personnel turnover is often a sign of cultural instability, poor succession planning, and a lack of internal cohesion. Nebraska's pattern of hiring and firing coaches, often with multimillion-dollar buyouts, suggests a short-term mindset at odds with the long-term success seen at programs like Wisconsin or Iowa, where athletic departments have historically exercised patience and alignment between athletic directors and coaches. Nebraska's frequent leadership changes have fractured its ability to build an enduring identity. Each new hire brings a new system, a new recruiting philosophy, and a new staff, which in turn resets the performance clock, draining both capital and trust.

It's not all bleak. Nebraska's facilities are world-class. The university has invested hundreds of millions in athletic infrastructure. The Hawks Championship Center and Osborne Athletic Complex remain top-tier. At the same time, the new Go Big Project adds a modernized football operations facility that will rival any in the nation. The volleyball program has become a national beacon, consistently competing for championships and drawing record-setting crowds. In Olympic sports, Nebraska performs admirably, particularly in wrestling, track and field, and women's basketball, which has seen modest growth under Amy Williams.

Academically, Nebraska maintains solid footing. The athletic department's Graduation Success Rate remains above the NCAA average, and academic support programs have expanded significantly over the past few years. Wellness resources, including mental health initiatives, are being actively promoted and used. These metrics underscore a well-rounded student-athlete experience and provide significant value for both recruits and donors, even if they don't drive direct revenue.

One area where Nebraska may have quietly outperformed expectations is in the NIL era. Despite its relatively small media market, Nebraska's status as a statewide brand with no professional sports competition has allowed it to punch above its weight in NIL fundraising. Through local collectives and robust donor coordination, Husker athletes—particularly in football and volleyball—are well-compensated and promoted. This gives Nebraska a rare competitive edge in athlete retention and recruitment, particularly when compared to coastal programs with diluted fan support.

Still, significant challenges persist. Nebraska's Big Ten peers are accelerating. Michigan and Ohio State remain perennial contenders for the College Football Playoff. Penn State, Wisconsin, and Iowa have found consistency through organizational alignment and culture. Even programs like Maryland and Rutgers have posted stronger basketball performances in recent years. Nebraska's financial strength and fan loyalty are not translating into competitive parity. That inefficiency is not just a sports problem; it's a strategic one.

To reverse this trend, the athletic department must undertake several reforms rooted in management discipline. First, it must commit to leadership stability. The hiring of Matt Rhule as head football coach represents an opportunity to finally build a program identity rooted in toughness, development, and continuity. The university must resist the urge to judge his tenure in one- or two-year snapshots. Meaningful cultural change requires time and the strategic patience to endure early growing pains.

Second, Nebraska should conduct a full-spectrum operational audit of its football program. This includes analyzing recruiting inefficiencies, integrating the transfer portal, managing injuries, developing staff, and optimizing data usage. Such an audit should not be coach-specific but rather a department-wide initiative to build institutional memory and eliminate recurring blind spots that have transcended regimes.

Third, Nebraska must strategically reallocate resources. While football will always dominate the landscape, the department should consider investing more in men's basketball—an area of underperformance with a relatively high ROI potential in terms of March Madness visibility and fan engagement. Concurrently, continued growth in volleyball and Olympic sports could further diversify the department's performance portfolio and increase its national brand footprint.

Fourth, Nebraska should double down on NIL and donor engagement, refining its approach from grassroots fundraising to a more structured, professional NIL infrastructure. The school already has momentum in this space; formalizing it can help it withstand the shockwaves of revenue-sharing and athlete-unionization debates looming on the horizon.
​
In conclusion, Nebraska's athletic department is not a failing operation. It is a high-revenue, well-supported, well-equipped enterprise operating far below its competitive capacity. It has the assets—funding, facilities, fan base, and branding—to succeed at the highest level. What it needs is strategic clarity, cultural alignment, and patience in execution. With the right internal reforms and long-term thinking, Nebraska can once again be more than a nostalgic powerhouse. It can be a modern, efficient, and respected force in the Big Ten.