The Devious Role of Public Relations in Elite University Branding

Public relations is essential to elite universities, allowing them to frame their public perception, influence media narratives, and shield their reputations from criticism. Their PR departments craft messaging highlighting the universities' social contributions, diversity initiatives, and financial aid programs while subtly deflecting attention away from structural inequities in admissions and the economic burden of attendance.

Messaging Around Financial Aid to Justify High Tuition

One of the most significant barriers to entry at elite universities is the cost of attendance, which often exceeds $80,000 per year when factoring in tuition, housing, and fees. These institutions use PR tactics to mitigate public outrage, emphasizing financial aid programs.

For instance, elite universities often highlight stories of low-income students who receive generous scholarships, framing themselves as engines of social mobility. They promote figures about the percentage of students receiving aid while downplaying the growing student debt crisis. Despite these efforts, the reality remains that most students at these institutions still come from wealthy backgrounds, with a disproportionate number of students hailing from the top income brackets. A 2017 study by The New York Times found that more students come from the top 1% of the income distribution at Ivy League schools than from the bottom 60% combined.

Deflecting Criticism of Legacy Admissions

Legacy admissions—where the children of alums receive preferential treatment in admissions decisions—have been widely criticized as antithetical to meritocracy. While universities publicly assert their commitment to diversity and equal opportunity, they continue to uphold legacy admissions policies that overwhelmingly benefit wealthy and predominantly white families.

PR teams counter criticism by emphasizing holistic admissions processes and increasing outreach to underrepresented groups. However, these universities rarely provide data on how legacy applicants are admitted at significantly higher rates than non-legacy applicants. According to a 2019 National Bureau of Economic Research study, legacy students at elite universities are admitted at rates nearly four times higher than non-legacy applicants with comparable academic credentials. By controlling the narrative, elite universities create the illusion of an equitable admissions system while ensuring that their wealthier donor bases remain satisfied.

Touting Diversity While Maintaining Exclusivity

Elite institutions frequently emphasize their efforts to diversify their student bodies, highlighting increasing percentages of students from underrepresented backgrounds. They showcase initiatives such as diversity recruitment programs, student testimonials, and new faculty hires from diverse backgrounds.

However, despite these efforts, many institutions maintain deeply entrenched disparities. Black and Hispanic students remain significantly underrepresented compared to their population demographics, and first-generation college students often struggle with imposter syndrome in historically exclusionary spaces. PR messaging focuses on progress rather than existing inequalities, ensuring that the broader public sees the university as an inclusive institution while systemic barriers persist. According to a 2023 report by The Chronicle of Higher Education, Black students comprise just 7% of Ivy League student bodies, despite representing 14% of the U.S. population.

Framing Philanthropy as Social Justice

Elite universities frequently publicize high-profile donations from wealthy alums, often positioning them as efforts to enhance accessibility and improve education. These donations, however, usually go toward constructing new buildings, funding research initiatives, or bolstering endowments that already total in the tens of billions of dollars.

PR messaging ensures that philanthropy is perceived as a force for good, even when these donations further entrench these institutions' exclusivity. The narrative focuses on the generosity of donors rather than the inherent inequalities of a system where elite education remains inaccessible to most people. For example, Harvard University's endowment exceeded $50 billion in 2023, yet its tuition costs continue to rise annually.

Ignoring Low Wages for Service Workers

While elite universities spend billions on infrastructure and research, they often underpay the essential service workers who keep their campuses running. Custodial staff, cafeteria workers, and security personnel frequently earn wages that barely meet living standards in the expensive cities where many of these institutions are located.

For example, a 2022 report revealed that janitors and dining hall workers at Ivy League institutions often make between $15 to $20 per hour, well below the living wage in cities like Boston and New York. In contrast, university presidents at these same institutions earn multi-million dollar salaries.

PR teams rarely acknowledge these disparities, focusing on the universities' broader commitments to labor rights and ethical employment practices. They may highlight partnerships with unions or increases in hourly wages that fail to keep pace with inflation, ensuring that these labor issues do not dominate public discourse.

Case Study: Northwestern University's Stadium Project

A striking example of this disparity can be seen in Northwestern University's ongoing stadium project. In 2022, the university announced plans to construct a new, state-of-the-art football stadium estimated to cost more than $880 million. While Northwestern touts the stadium as a community asset and an economic booster, critics have pointed out the stark contrast between this lavish investment and the struggles of its service workers.

In 2023, campus service workers protested against low wages, citing stagnant pay that failed to keep pace with the cost of living in Evanston, Illinois. Many of these employees—who include janitors, food service workers, and maintenance staff—earn wages below what is considered a living wage for the area.
​
Despite their essential contributions to campus operations, they remain underpaid while the university prioritizes high-profile, revenue-generating projects. Northwestern's PR team has attempted to frame the stadium project to benefit the local community while avoiding discussing wage gaps affecting its lowest-paid workers. This case highlights how elite universities often prioritize branding and capital projects over the well-being of their essential staff.

Crisis Management and Damage Control

Elite universities are not immune to scandals, whether admissions fraud (as seen in the 2019 Varsity Blues scandal), allegations of faculty misconduct, or criticisms of their role in gentrification and economic inequality. PR teams swiftly engage in crisis management strategies when these controversies arise to contain the damage.

Shifting the Focus

One common tactic is to shift focus away from controversy by amplifying unrelated positive stories. Suppose an elite university is facing backlash for discriminatory practices. In that case, it may concurrently release a press statement about a significant diversity initiative or a groundbreaking research discovery.

Control Over Media Narratives

Elite universities have strong relationships with major media outlets, often influencing how stories about them are reported. They strategically provide exclusive access to journalists sympathetic to their messaging while limiting engagement with those who might take a more critical stance. This ensures that their perspective dominates mainstream narratives, reducing the impact of negative press.

Conclusion: The Reality Behind the PR Curtain
​
While elite universities portray themselves as institutions dedicated to intellectual advancement and social progress, their PR strategies reveal a different reality. They maintain exclusivity while appearing inclusive by strategically highlighting select narratives and deflecting criticism. Their adept use of public relations ensures that the public continues viewing them as pillars of opportunity—even as they perpetuate systemic educational inequalities.