The Dismal State of Athletics at Northwestern University: Scandal, Reform, and a Flailing Search for Identity

Rendering of Northwestern University's $800 Million Stadium, Currently Under Construction

Northwestern University has long prided itself on its dual reputation for academic excellence and Big Ten athletic competitiveness. For decades, the Wildcats have stood out in the conference as a private school with rigorous admissions standards, balancing the demands of elite athletics with those of a world-class research university. Yet, in recent years, Northwestern’s athletic department has been rocked by scandal, legal scrutiny, and a period of reckoning that has left Northwestern with the worst athletics program in the Big Ten Conference, careening between disasters both on the field and in the clubhouse.

At the same time as the discord unfolded, Northwestern initiated the construction of the costliest college stadium project ever constructed.  The optics of this $800 million project unfolding at the same time as the scandals are poor, a fact ignored in formal Northwestern University communications crowing about the immense cost.  This highlights the state of Northwestern's tone deafness, bragging about its financial ability to fund an extravagant stadium while concealing the serious safety and health issues to athletes caused by the lack of administrative control under nondisclosure agreements in legal settlements.

The graven damage to Northwestern athletes from the lack of administrative control is a moral issue, unacknowledged by Northwestern University.

A Tradition Rocked by Scandal

For much of the modern era, Northwestern’s athletic programs carried a reputation for integrity and overachievement. The football team’s improbable 1995 Rose Bowl run and success stories in basketball, soccer, and lacrosse fueled a sense of pride that the school could “do things the right way.” But beneath the surface, reports of abusive cultures and institutional neglect began to surface, culminating in a series of allegations and lawsuits that have shaken the university to its core.

The crisis erupted publicly in the summer of 2023 when the university fired longtime head football coach Pat Fitzgerald following reports of hazing and abusive behavior within the football program. A university-commissioned investigation had earlier concluded that hazing did occur but found “insufficient evidence” that Fitzgerald or other leaders knew about it. However, mounting media attention and the emergence of graphic details, including allegations of coerced sexualized acts, physical abuse, and racial harassment, made it impossible for the administration to maintain the status quo.

As more athletes came forward, the scope of the scandal expanded. Lawsuits soon named the football program and men’s and women’s sports, including baseball and volleyball, alleging a broader pattern of institutional failure. Some plaintiffs described retaliation for speaking out, a lack of oversight by athletic administrators, and a climate where abuse was tolerated in the name of competitiveness.

Legal Fallout and Immense Settlements

In the wake of these revelations, Northwestern has faced a cascade of lawsuits from former athletes alleging harm, negligence, and, in some cases, discrimination. The legal claims have forced the university into several high-profile settlements, many with confidentiality clauses that prevent full public disclosure. While the terms of individual cases remain private, the overall fiscal impact on the university is significant, with millions of dollars allocated to resolve claims, enhance mental health resources, and pay for external reviews.

These legal battles have also prompted federal investigations and intense scrutiny from the NCAA and the Big Ten Conference. Title IX compliance became a flashpoint as multiple female athletes alleged failures to address gender-based harassment and discrimination. The university’s legal filings have sometimes acknowledged “systemic lapses” in oversight, and several top athletic department officials resigned or were reassigned in the aftermath.

Upheaval at the Athletic Director Position

At the center of Northwestern’s athletic crisis lies a series of abrupt changes in athletic department leadership. The sudden departure of athletic director Derrick Gragg in the wake of mounting criticism created a leadership vacuum at a pivotal moment. Gragg, brought in with the mandate to elevate Northwestern’s profile and competitiveness, found his tenure overwhelmed by crisis management and legal fallout. His exit and the departure or reassignment of other senior athletic staff destabilized a fragile department.

In the interim, the university appointed Janna Blais, previously deputy athletic director, as acting athletic director. While Blais provided a steady hand, her mandate focused on triage and immediate reforms rather than long-term strategy. 

In late 2024, Northwestern hired Mark Jackson, then Villanova's athletic director, as the athletic director.  Jackson is early in his tenure, and the jury's still out on his vision and performance.  Villanova is a basketball-first school, with an annual athletic department budget of $63 million, a pittance compared with Big Ten budgets, so he came from a much smaller environment.  One questions whether he has the experience, acumen, and authority to manage a much bigger program, and if Northwestern University even has the ambition to overhaul and modernize their program.

It has become increasingly apparent that Northwestern is not structurally equipped to manage the complexities and demands of a modern athletic department. Northwestern's athletic organization remains small and decentralized, unlike the Big Ten's athletic powerhouses, which operate with extensive administrative layers, specialized compliance offices, and robust support systems for athlete welfare.

The university’s underfunded infrastructure, combined with a tradition of academic oversight and cautious leadership, has resulted in slow responses to emerging crises and a fragmented approach to governance. These shortcomings are not merely administrative oversights; they reflect a systemic problem rooted in a long-standing reluctance to treat athletics as a fully integrated, strategically vital part of the university.

As a result, communication breakdown, lack of accountability, and insufficient resources have persisted for years, making the department vulnerable to scandal and stagnation. The recent controversies have exposed how these deep-seated structural problems go far beyond individual failures, revealing an urgent need for comprehensive organizational reform.

Struggling to Adapt to a Changing College Athletics Landscape

Northwestern’s scandals have unfolded during an unprecedented transformation in college sports. Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) rights, the transfer portal, and major conference realignment have upended old models. Universities are expected to run athletic departments like complex businesses, cultivating brand partnerships, supporting athlete entrepreneurship, and managing multimillion-dollar media deals. In this climate, institutional agility is essential.

Yet Northwestern’s governance model, marked by cautious decision-making, faculty oversight, and a tradition of decentralized management, has left it ill-equipped to seize new opportunities or respond rapidly to crises. The school has fallen far behind without a clear NIL strategy or aggressive donor engagement. Peer institutions such as Ohio State and Michigan have moved quickly to establish NIL collectives and brand management teams. Northwestern’s response has been halting and uncertain.

This structural conservatism also has complicated efforts to rebuild trust. While the administration has enacted new policies and formed review committees, real culture change requires resources, long-term vision, and a willingness to embrace the evolving realities of college athletics. Some insiders worry that Northwestern’s historic reluctance to invest in athletics fully will keep the department in a defensive posture rather than positioning it for future success.

Institutional Reform and the Road Forward

Faced with mounting pressure, Northwestern’s leadership initiated a series of reforms designed to restore trust and protect student-athletes. These included independent oversight committees, increased mental health resources, expanded Title IX training, and new reporting tools.

However, critics argue these measures do not go far enough and that greater change will only come with new leadership and a willingness to rethink old assumptions. A thorough department overhaul seems to be the only realistic solution to the long-standing structural and process problems behind the chaos of lawsuits and inferior performance.

Recruiting remains a challenge. Some prospective athletes and their families remain wary, questioning whether the changes are more cosmetic than substantive. Competing programs have used Northwestern’s troubles in negative recruiting pitches, further complicating rebuilding efforts.

Impact on University Community and Reputation

The scandal has affected the athletic department and the broader Northwestern community. Faculty and student groups have demanded greater accountability and transparency. At the same time, some donors have put gifts on hold pending further reforms. The university’s administration has had to walk a tightrope, balancing the need for decisive action with a desire to avoid scapegoating individuals without due process.

Public perception has also shifted. Once lauded for integrity and achievement against the odds, Northwestern’s athletic department now faces skepticism from the media, alumni, and even within its ranks. How the university addresses these concerns will shape its national reputation for years.

Conclusion: Searching for Identity and Renewal

The state of Northwestern University's athletics in 2025 is defined by upheaval, soul-searching, and slow, difficult progress toward reform. Recent scandals, lawsuits, and settlements have exposed deep flaws in the oversight and culture of Wildcat athletics, challenging cherished narratives and forcing a reckoning with past failures.
​
Yet, amid the crisis, there are signs of renewal. The university’s willingness to confront hard truths, invest in reform, and prioritize the well-being of its student-athletes marks a crucial first step. Whether Northwestern can once again become a leader in college athletics, known for both excellence and integrity, remains to be seen. The coming years will test not only the resilience of its teams but the depth of its commitment to meaningful change.